首页> 外文OA文献 >A comparison of microtensile and microcompression methods for studying plastic properties of nanocrystalline electrodeposited nickel at different length scales
【2h】

A comparison of microtensile and microcompression methods for studying plastic properties of nanocrystalline electrodeposited nickel at different length scales

机译:研究不同长度尺度下纳米晶电沉积镍塑性的微拉伸和微压缩方法的比较

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

A comparison of microcompression and microtensile methods to study mechanical properties of electrodeposited nanocrystalline (nc) nickel has been performed. Microtensile tests that probe a volume of more than 2 × 106 μm3 show reasonable agreement with results from microcompression tests that probe much smaller volumes down to a few μm3. Differences between the two uniaxial techniques are discussed in terms of measurements errors, probed volume and surface effects, strain rate, and influence of stress state. Uniaxial solicitation in compression mode revealed several advantages for studying stress-strain properties
机译:进行了微压缩和微拉伸方法的比较,以研究电沉积纳米晶体(nc)镍的机械性能。探测大于2×106μm3的体积的微拉伸试验显示出与微压缩试验的结果合理吻合,微压缩试验的结果探测的体积小至几μm3。讨论了两种单轴技术之间的差异,包括测量误差,探测的体积和表面效应,应变率以及应力状态的影响。压缩模式下的单轴拉拔揭示了研究应力应变特性的几个优点

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号